Life After Little Sandy

Navigating the Murky Waters of Research Credits: The Impact of the Little Sandy Coal Ruling and IRS Audits

In a recent legal development, the Seventh Circuit Court’s ruling on Little Sandy Coal Company, Inc. v. Commissioner (“LSC”) has created a climate of uncertainty around the federal income tax credit for increasing research activities under Sec. 41. 

The court found the company lacking in providing adequate substantiation for their research activities, thereby failing the “substantially all” and “process-of-experimentation” tests. While the IRS has used this ruling to broadly deny research credits during audits, it has not offered actionable guidance on what would be considered sufficient substantiation, leaving taxpayers in a precarious situation. The lack of clarity has not only complicated matters for claims under Sec. 41, but has also raised questions about its impact on Sec. 174, specifically regarding what level of documentation is required for capitalizing and amortizing research and experimental expenditures. 

The IRS is set to provide new regulations on research credit substantiation, but for now, taxpayers remain in a challenging landscape.

Source Advisors’ Lindsey Moldich Spoke with The Journal of Accountancy to detail key takeaways from this case: 

Related Articles

Contact Source Advisors for a Free Assessment

Embrace the power of tax credit savings with Source Advisors and propel your business towards growth and success. Partner with us today to unlock your company’s full potential.